https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/issue/feedArchivaria2024-11-07T13:45:37-08:00Heather Homegeneral.editor@archivists.caOpen Journal SystemsArchivaria - The Journal of the Association of Canadian Archivistshttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/14011 Front & Back Covers2024-11-01T19:25:52-07:00. .2024-11-01T19:13:44-07:00Copyright (c) https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/14013Inside Covers2024-11-01T19:25:52-07:00. .2024-11-01T19:18:19-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Archivariahttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/14015Table of Contents2024-11-01T19:25:52-07:00. .2024-11-01T19:19:39-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Archivariahttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13987Finding Traces of Cows in the Archives and Telling Stories Differently2024-11-07T13:37:16-08:00Claudia Towne Hirtenfelder<p>Archives are more-than-human spaces, and scholars are increasingly exploring how traditional archival material can be used to understand the historical lives of animals. There are traces of animals in any archives because humans do not exist in isolation and have historically been ecologically and socially entangled with other species. There is, however, a great deal of scope to develop innovative methods for telling animals’ histories in ways that treat them as subjects, not objects. Using my PhD research into the historical problematization of cows in Kingston, Ontario, between 1838 and 1938, this article charts some of the methods I developed to better position historical animals as experiential subjects in analyses of the past. More specifically, I focus on how I found traces of cows in the Queen’s University Archives by looking at a range of municipal records, including city assessments and health documents. I also explain how I conducted a multispecies discourse analysis of those traces by using contemporary knowledge about the psychology and physiology of cows, employing map-making techniques, and crafting speculative vignettes. I conclude that tracing animals in municipal records, being sensitive to contemporary knowledge about them, and making use of creative methodological tools to visibilize their spatial and social worlds is both academically interesting and politically significant. These methods challenge the anthropomorphism typical of historical and urban analyses, consequently creating openings for different ways of telling stories.</p>2024-11-01T18:31:13-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Claudia Towne Hirtenfelderhttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13989Creating a Community Cloud2024-11-07T13:36:04-08:00Conrad StoeszJason HildebrandGreg Bak<p>Developing and sustaining digital infrastructure is challenging for small community archives. The promise of open-source technologies can seem elusive for those faced with the steep development costs of implementing and configuring new systems and migrating data from legacy systems. When community archives co-operate by forming consortia, the costs and challenges of development, implementation, and migration can be mitigated and shared. We offer a case study of the development of an open-source Access to Memory (AtoM) database among a consortium of Mennonite archives.</p>2024-11-01T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Conrad Stoesz, Jason Hildebrand, Greg Bakhttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13991Leveraging Technology to Facilitate Access2024-11-07T13:45:37-08:00Katrina Cohen-PalaciosSarah Lake<p>In recent years, the increasing volume of born-digital materials (i.e., those created digitally rather than digitized from analog originals) deposited in archives has fostered the development of new software-based tools and workflows for processing archivists. Archivists seeking practical guidance for preserving digital materials have a wealth of resources at their disposal, including many community-owned tools, workflows, and tutorials. This case study examines how archival standards and technological advances have influenced the semi-automated description of born-digital audio records through the lens of a recent project at the Clara Thomas Archives and Special Collections (CTASC) at York University Libraries (YUL). The Mariposa Folk Foundation Fonds, containing a large and growing collection of born-digital audio recordings, served as an opportunity to design and test a new software-aided descriptive workflow. The project leverages the programmable nature of born-digital materials in an attempt to streamline the time-consuming process for creating the item-level descriptions typically associated with sound recordings and born-digital records while also improving the discoverability of this material in the unmediated environment of online finding aids. This case study demonstrates how technology has influenced descriptive practices, with the advent of online finding aids providing increased access to archival descriptions, online databases permitting keyword searching, and tools to script metadata extracted from born-digital records enabling robust archival descriptions.</p>2024-11-01T18:46:44-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Katrina Cohen-Palacios, Sarah Lakehttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13993“There’s Just No Real Way to Win”2024-11-07T13:44:43-08:00Gracen Mikus BrilmyerVeronica L. DenisonJill K. SadlerTara Brar<p>Centring around first person accounts, this article shows how some disabled archivists have experienced many different ableist expectations and assumptions in their work: through requirements in job descriptions, performance, and productivity and attitudes around comportment, accommodations, and disability. Drawing on a wide array of literature on disability, affect, and the archival profession while using data collected through interviews with disabled archivists, this article highlights some affective dimensions of archival labour. Interviewees’ past experiences led to an acute awareness of how they might or might not be perceived as “professional.” And managing this awareness and their concerns led to a variety of strategies: participants described overperforming, denying their own needs, and “pushing through” as well as expending significant amounts of time, energy, and work in anticipating, navigating, and managing others’ feelings and ableist attitudes. Together, these findings outline some of the ways disabled people experience the archival profession, perform labour that might be less legible and under-recognized, and feel about their place in the profession. Moreover, such labour illustrates a double bind for disabled archivists – what we might call a paradox of archival ableism. As they navigate others’ assumptions about disability – discriminatory opinions about capabilities,harmful behaviour, and ableist expectations – they simultaneously have to over-perform, advocate for their own worthiness for accommodations, and balance the ways these efforts might counteract, contradict, or work against each other. In other words, the paradox of archival ableism is how ableism produces a double bind of having to prove that one is both capable of work and also deserving of the very accommodations needed to do the work and how these efforts often work against each other.</p>2024-11-01T18:52:29-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Gracen Mikus Brilmyer, Veronica L. Denison, Jill K. Sadler, Tara Brarhttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13995“It’s Not the Materials Themselves, It’s the Attitude of the Donors”2024-11-07T13:43:51-08:00Travis L. WagnerAllan A. MartellShannon M. Oltmann<p>This article reports on findings from semi-structured interviews with 25 archivists and curators who work with LGBTQIA+-related collections and materials about the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Specifically, it reports on how these practitioners define and engage with ethical practices, access-based obligations, and community relations in creating and sustaining their archives. The article focuses on how participants, including practitioners from various community and institutional archives of varying size and scope across the United States, understood community accountability within their work. This emphasis on community accountability necessitated that practitioners reframe archival ethics, reconsider subjective and embodied collection and curation work, and prioritize community well-being over quantitative collection building. In response to these findings, the article identifies theoretical and practical implications for queer archives related to methods of archival production, approaches to community outreach and engagement, and the intersecting impact of these implications and approaches on questions of archival sustainability for queer and other historically marginalized histories.</p>2024-11-01T18:56:23-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Travis L. Wagner, Allan A. Martell, Shannon M. Oltmannhttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13997Waiting for RiC2024-11-07T13:43:06-08:00Richard Dancy2024-11-01T18:58:19-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Richard Dancyhttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13999KRISTA MCCRACKEN AND SKYLEE-STORM HOGAN-STACEY. Decolonial Archival Futures.2024-11-07T13:41:24-08:00Delia Chartrand<p>Decolonial Archival Futures. Krista McCracken and Skylee- Storm Hogan-Stacey. Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman, 2023. 112 pp. 9780838937150</p>2024-11-01T19:02:21-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Delia Chartrandhttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/14001TONIA SUTHERLAND. Resurrecting the Black Body: Race and the Digital Afterlife.2024-11-07T13:40:53-08:00Melissa J. Nelson<p class="p1"><em>Resurrecting the Black Body: Race and the Digital Afterlife</em>.</p> <p class="p1">Tonia Sutherland. Oakland, CA: University of California Press,</p> <p class="p1">2023. 232 pp. 9780520383876</p>2024-11-01T19:04:17-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Melissa J. Nelsonhttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/14003JOHN A. AARONS, JEANETTE A. BASTIAN AND STANLEY H. GRIFFIN, eds. Archiving Caribbean Identity: Records, Community, and Memory.2024-11-07T13:40:21-08:00Dharani Persaud<p class="p1">Archiving Caribbean Identity: Records, Community, and Memory<span class="s1">.</span></p> <p class="p1">John A. Aarons, Jeannette A. Bastian, and Stanley H. Griffin, eds.</p> <p class="p1">Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2022. 264 pp. 9780367615116</p>2024-11-01T00:00:00-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Dharani Persaudhttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/14005OLYMPIA BOBOU, AMY C. MIRANDA, RUBINA RAJA, eds. Archival Historiographies: The Impact of Twentieth-Century Legacy Data on Archaeological Investigations.2024-11-07T13:39:41-08:00Robert J. Stark<p class="p1">Archival Historiographies: The Impact of Twentieth-Century</p> <p class="p1">Legacy Data on Archaeological Investigations. Olympia Bobou,</p> <p class="p1">Amy C. Miranda, and Rubina Raja, eds. Turnhout, Belgium:</p> <p class="p1">Brepols, 2022. xii, 180 pp. 9782503600185</p>2024-11-01T19:08:53-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Robert J. Starkhttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/14007Age of Influence: Youth & Nazi Propaganda. Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre, Vancouver, BC2024-11-07T13:39:12-08:00Andres Resto-Spotts<p>Age of Influence: Youth & Nazi Propaganda. Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia. Open from March 15, 2023. Curated by Tessa Coutu and Franziska Schurr, Exhibition developed by Lise Kirchner.</p>2024-11-01T19:11:05-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Andres Resto-Spottshttps://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/14009Archives by Artists. Archives of Ontario, Toronto, ON2024-11-07T13:38:01-08:00Amy Marshall Furness<p>Archives by Artists. Archives of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario. December 19, 2023 – October 4, 2024. Curated by DisplayCult (Jennifer Fisher and Jim Drobnick).</p>2024-11-01T19:12:35-07:00Copyright (c) 2024 Amy Marshall Furness