Electronic Records and the Law of Evidence in Canada: The Uniform Electronic Evidence Act Twelve Years Later
Abstract
This article analyzes the adequacy of the Uniform Electronic Evidence Act, twelve years after its adoption, in dealing with the complexity of the records created, used, or stored in the digital environment. In the face of rapidly changing technology, the authors believe that the nature and characteristics of electronic records cannot be accounted for by simple modifications to the existing law of evidence, but require a new enactment following upon a close collaboration among records professions, legal and law enforcement professions, and the information technology profession. The new rules, comprehensively encompassing issues of relevance, admissibility, and weight of electronic documentary evidence, must be based on the body of knowledge of each profession, on the findings of interdisciplinary research, and on existing records-related standards. The enactment of such rules would help the courts make accurate findings of fact, based on electronic records that are created in a reliable environment and preserved in an authentic form for as long as they might be needed, and would alleviate ongoing confusion about the admissibility and use of electronic records in litigation.
RÉSUMÉ
Cet article analyse la pertinence du Uniform Electronic Evidence Act, douze ans après son adoption, pour traiter de la complexité des documents créés, consultés ou conservés dans un environnement numérique. Face aux changements rapides dans le domaine de la technologie, les auteurs croient qu’on ne peut pas tenir compte de la nature et des caractéristiques des documents numériques en effectuant de simples modifications à la loi existante, mais qu’on doit faire promulguer une nouvelle législation qui tiendra compte de la collaboration étroite entre les professionnels qui travaillent dans les domaines des documents d’archives, du droit et du respect de la loi, et des technologies de l’information. Les nouveaux règlements, couvrant l’ensemble des questions liées à la pertinence, l’admissibilité et le poids de la preuve documentaire électronique, devront être basés à la fois sur le corpus du savoir de chaque profession, les résultats de la recherche interdisciplinaire et les normes existantes par rapport aux documents d’archives. La promulgation de tels règlements aiderait les tribunaux à tirer des conclusions exactes, basées sur des documents numériques créés dans des environnements fiables et conservés sous forme authentique aussi longtemps que nécessaire, ce qui amoindrirait la confusion continue au sujet de l’admissibilité et de l’usage des documents numériques dans les procès.
Authors of manuscripts accepted for publication retain copyright in their work. They are required to sign the Agreement on Authors' Rights and Responsibilities that permits Archivaria to publish and disseminate the work in print and electronically. In the same agreement, authors are required to confirm that "the material submitted for publication in Archivaria, both in its paper and electronic versions, including reproductions of other works (e.g. photographs, maps, etc.) does not infringe upon any existing copyright." Authors of manuscripts accepted for publication retain copyright in their work and are able to publish their articles in institutional repositories or elsewhere as long as the piece is posted after its original appearance on archivaria.ca. Any reproduction within one year following the date of this agreement requires the permission of the General Editor.