Archiving Paul: Manuscripts, Religion, and the Editorial Shaping of Ancient Letter Collections

  • Gregory Fewster

Abstract

In “Archiving Paul,” the author attempts to “think archivally” about what has come to be called the corpus Paulinum – a collection of 13 (or so) letters attributed to Paul of Tarsus, who is commemorated as one of the founding figures of Christianity. This article looks to archiving practices associated with ancient letters, primarily Paul’s letters, in an effort to expose how such practices employ different editorial strategies with the effect of producing varying construals of authenticity and originality. After arguing that the textual history of the corpus Paulinum can be considered as an archive, the author generalizes three modes by which editors have shaped that archival material: collection, corpus, and canon. While these modes are not necessarily meant to be applicable for all archival study, their relevance specifically to the corpus Paulinum facilitates an awareness of the different forms that archival alteration can take and the way in which such shaping mediates the engagement of subsequent users.


RÉSUMÉ

Dans « Archiving Paul », l’auteur tente de « penser de façon archivistique » au sujet de ce qu’on appelle maintenant le corpus Paulinum – une collection d’environ treize lettres attribuées à Paul de Tarse, qui est reconnu comme l’une des figures fondatrices de la chrétienté. Cet article examine les pratiques archivistiques liées aux anciennes lettres, surtout celles de Paul, dans le but de montrer comment de telles pratiques se servent de différentes stratégies de rédaction qui ont comme résultat de produire des interprétations variantes de l’authenticité et de l’originalité. Après avoir présenté son argument que l’histoire textuelle du corpus Paulinum peut être considérée comme un document d’archives, l’auteur généralise trois façons par lesquels les rédacteurs ont formé le matériel archivistique : collection, corpus et canon. Alors que ces façons ne sont pas nécessairement destinées à être applicables à toutes les archives, leur pertinence spécifique au corpus Paulinum facilite une prise de conscience des différentes formes que peut prendre la modification archivistique et la manière dont de tels façonnages servent d’intermédiaire lorsque de subséquents utilisateurs s’y engagent.

Author Biography

Gregory Fewster

Gregory Fewster is a PhD student at the University of Toronto, in the Department for the Study of Religion, and he works in collaboration with the Program in Book History and Print Culture. His research inquires about the developing book cultures of early Christianity, with special attention to the production and reception of literary forgeries (called pseudepigraphy) and other modes of textual alteration. His interest in this area has resulted in two recent articles, “Can I Have Your Autograph? On Thinking about Pauline Authorship and Pseudepigraphy,” in the Bulletin for the Study of Religion 43, no. 3 (September 2014), and “Hermeneutical Issues in Canonical Pseudepigraphy: The Head/Body Motif in the Pauline Corpus as a Test Case,” in Paul and Pseudepigraphy (Leiden, NL: Brill, 2013). He has done pioneering work in lexicographical data collection for the digitized archive Thesaurus Linguae Graecae, developing corpus linguistic theories appropriate for Greek-language research. He published the results of this study in a monograph titled Creation Language in Romans 8: A Study in Monosemy, also published by Brill (2013).  

Published
2016-05-06
How to Cite
Fewster, Gregory. 2016. “Archiving Paul: Manuscripts, Religion, and the Editorial Shaping of Ancient Letter Collections”. Archivaria 81 (May), 101-28. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13560.
Section
Articles